Home
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
Brooke Shields just announced that she regretted not having sex early.
“I think I would have had sex a lot earlier,” she says to Health magazine. “I think I would have been much more in touch with myself.”
Shields was not speaking to Vogue or Cosmopolitan. She was speaking to Health magazine. So you have to listen to her. Seriously.
The actress thinks that losing her virginity at 22 was late. “I think I wouldn’t have had issues with weight – I carried this protective 20 pounds [in college]. It was all connected,” she says. “I think I would have lost my virginity earlier than I did at 22.”
It now threw a monkey screw into our stew. What do we now tell our kids?
Should they keep their virginity for a long time or should they lose it as soon as possibly?
“The older I get, the younger I feel,” the actress says. “Growing up, I was always the kid, but I spoke like an adult and was in adult roles…I always thought when you get older, you’ll want to slow down, but I want to do even more.”
To hell with AIDS, pregnancy and STDs. Brooke Shields wanted sex early.
You may ask who is Brooke Shields to say. But wasn’t she the one that talked about postpartum depression which put Tom Cruise in trouble when he tried to prescribe Scientology to her instead of psychiatry?
So don’t even try to say she is giving young women the wrong message -unless you want her to debate Bristol Palin on Today with Matt Lauer.
Obviously, Brooke Shields is not giving young girls excuse to avoid exercise. She is not creating a new reason why some young girls’ loss control of their bodies. Ms. Shields knows what she is talking about. After all, she went to Princeton University.
Do you agree?
When did you lose your virginity? Was it too late or too early? Did it have impact on how you view your body?
Are you now making up for time you lost?
RSS 
Why is it humans even give a second look at people like her but not a glance to the billions of humans that have stories to tell and no one cares
Theses useless actors and actresses get paid well for the little they contribute to society
That tells alot about weak mentally of humans who want to make heroes of people or of unknown gods
No wonder humans are still primative and unequal in there feelings for all
Well said.Read your comment after a very long time.It’s refreshing !
Sorry but it wound me up
People want to look up instead of looking at humans as equals
Answer to the question do you have regrets? Hell no, the only thing I missed out on was sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, questions of paternity, being devalued in the eyes of the people who matter to me, poverty and a boat load of drama. If I had it to do all over, I do do exactly the same thing, keep my legs closed!
Why do younger people hail these stupid celebrities as their role model ?
When I was a kid, all of my friends had pictures of Donny Osmond on their walls, I had pictures of Mr. Spock from the TV show Star Trek on mine, not the actor that played him, but the character. That character was intelligent, logical, rational and reasonable, I really admired that.
If I had to guess why young people admire media figures so much, I would have to say that their parents focused on the external things in life like money, prestige, looks, clothes etc. and they never learned about intrinsic values. Also, they may admire the fact that these people are rewarded handsomely for doing very little and that appeals to the laziness in them.
You sure talk logic that i think will be missed by most–too bad
”Mr. Spock from the TV show Star Trek on mine, not the actor that played him, but the character.”
Many thanks for taking me back in my early years of childhood.Mr. Spock was one of my favourite characters during those days.
Pawarin yo have missed an important point.You seem to forget that younger lot often treat these celebrities as role models.What they eat,what they wear and what they drink etc. often come to shape the living pattern of their followers.So you just cannot ignore the fact that what they preach sometimes ,if not often, stir the innocent minds.
Rudolf has raised an important point,albeit in his usual lighter vain.
We people believe that drugs and alchohol are not life. Coming to societies in our India everything happens more than what it happens there. But none comes out with truth.
India knows truth but led astray.
If a person drinks or takes drugs its not hep. is it?
In the same way if you speak rubbish like virginity in public the mind starts acting upon it. It goes to the act of sex and looking at it separately from marriage which is not moralistic.
You people who dont want to see someone suffering from poverty or illiteracy then how can you see people suffering becos of bad mind set. its even horrible. I tell you i fasted many days and i dont mind being without food if it comes to that . But not having clean conscience affects all. All are human beings . We all have same conscience and constitution.
It's all about cultures. it's all about the free society which your country perhaps doesn't endorse as of now. i don't condemn your society coz what is a music to some, may be noise to others. What you think is according to your society and what the person concerned here is talking is according to her culture. that's is why west and east are miles away and different. what say?????
Girls here are giving birth to babies at 14-15.