What do Presidents really do?
24 Star
Share This Post
Rudolf , New York: Jun 12 2008
Made Popular Jun 12 2008

white-house_mrkVD_65George W. Bush will not survive one Wednesday as a British Prime Minister.

In fact, he would have resigned if told he would be subjected to the rigorous question and answer session that Prime Ministers undergo every Wednesday in the House of Commons.

Not even Bush’s alter ego, Dick Cheney, would have survived it. Cheney’s disdain for openness and opposing viewpoints would not let him stand up in front of parliament and take questions. He would rather prefer to have a heart attack than do anything that accountable to the people.

The presidency, especially of the United States, is such a shielded position that anybody can be placed in that office and the country will continue unscratched. (Not far from what movie goers saw in the motion picture Dave)

The reason why George W. damaged the United States was because the Republican Congress in 1998 destroyed an important leash used to hold the president in place – they misused the impeachment clause on Bill Clinton. (Sorry Dennis Kucinich)

What it set in motion was the outrageous reign of Bush Jr. It was a reign full of arrogance and it was dangerous to the proportion that the United States has never seen since the days of Richard Nixon. There will be no good grasp of what really happened in the last seven years (sorry Scot McClellan) until thirty years from now when the secret papers of Bush-Cheney are revealed.

The Bush-Cheney presidency was able to fool the people for so long because the other arms of government, the judiciary and the legislature all gave in to the environment of fear and intimidation created and fostered by Bush and Cheney. The last group, the Fourth Estate, who were supposed to be the final protector of we, the people, also succumbed.

Yet, the Republic survived because inherent in the American system is that inbuilt sieve of freedom that guarantees the survival of the nation. Abraham Lincoln described it this way: “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”

Men with non-existing mental curiosity (wink, wink, George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan) have managed to preside over these United States without the ship sinking. The current president, G. W., is still carrying on even though he comes across as a man who hasn’t finished learning his alphabets.

Reagan proved a man could be President for life. Clinton proved anybody could be President; and G.W. Bush proved we don’t need a President.

While it is good to have a president who exhumes intelligence, comes into office with a vision, and enough experience to understand his country and the world around, it has been proven time and time again that the president is “like a man appointed in a family to buy the meat.” In these days of coli and salmonella, it is important to have a president alert to the dangers of today.

The institutions of the United States as well as the people are the only safeguard to America’s potential abuse in the hands of its president. Such abuses have come from experienced as well as inexperienced presidents. The only solution to such abuse is the continuing straightening of these institutions, the vigilance of its people and insistence that the three arms of government retain their independents.

Judging by the 2004 reelection of George W., I wonder if the people have learnt their lesson. But I am sure that the institutions of these United States will see the Republic through to another day irrespective of what happens on November 4, 2008.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
This dreck is an excellent illustration of the reality that MFA students should not try to write about politics. It demeans Instablogs that you publish such claptrap, totally barren of research, a weird illiterate stream of consciousness that it seems you spent about 15 seconds to spew out. I beseech you to cease doing so.

I wonder what a group of MFA students would think of a PoliSci student pontificating about their field . . .

Here’s just a few of the major faults in this post:

(1) No links.

(2) No example of any British PM ever being seriously harmed by a bad performance during questioning.

(3) The author is so absurdly ignorant about basic current events that he doesn’t know John McCain has proposed submitting to questions just as the British do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/28/AR2008052802917.html

(4) No attempt to explain how the failed impeachment of Clinton freed Bush (this was not the first impeachment to fail, the author does not seem to realize).

(5) ”inbuilt sieve of freedom” is gibberish. I guess what you mean is that the president has very little power compared to leaders of other countries, so it doesn’t really matter that much what he does.

(6) It’s ”exudes” not ”exhumes” the latter means dig up from the dead.

(7) It seems to be just fine with the author if presidents he agrees with (LBJ, FDR) abuse their power. He only gets bothered when those he doesn’t like do it. He doesn’t seem to realize it doesn’t quite work that way in real life.

Rudy, buddy, I implore you, stick to what you know. You are making a total ass of yourself.
1 Stars
Hey man, you didn’t need to come that hard on the fellow. Yes, there are some mistakes but he has put together a nice piece here. And for the most part he is right. Wouldn’t you agree.
By the way, it’s an opinion piece, links are not required.
Be a little tolerant of ignorance also because we all are ignorant in varying degrees. Wouldn’t you agree?
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Evan
Brooklyn, United States
uneasy is the person who wears the crown and if he is the president of the USA there is every reason for him to be ill at ease. what he does and what doesn't is under scan all the time and unlike a commoner like me he has hell lot of responsibilities to come up to. so it is too easy to say , but even Bush once said that there were moments in his life during presidency when he felt like crying.
1 Stars
Jose
Los Angeles, United States
United States made two historical blunders. They were made by two different institutions. The first mistake was made by the Judiciary that hauled Bush to power against Gore. The second mistake was made by the Electorate, by common people like you and me by voting the devil reincarnate himself to the presidency for a second term.

We have now the godsend opportunity to correct our mistake and atone for the sin we have committed by wiping out the Republican neocons from the political board now. I agree with Rudolf it was an outrageous reign for which the world would take ages to forgive those who voted for Bush last time.

Time for atonement, time to kick the Republicans out of the White House.
2 Stars
Jason
Arlington, United States
File Type: Image
Bush is a neo-Nazi in disguise. There is no difference between Dick Cheney and an occultist like David Koresh.

The Republicans are symbolized by half-wits such as Bush, Cheney and McCain that somehow manages to grab power because the half-wits they represent outnumber the intelligent voters as one of the commenters above. Somehow.

Besides, one should not forget Bush's scandalous relationship with Kenneth Lay. This man is apparently a fraudster leading a party consisting of religious radicals, homophobes, Russophobes, racists, dim-wits, corrupt people etc.
1 Stars
Non
Bucharest, Romania
What do (United States') presidents do? Depends on what party he belongs to. If he is a Republican, he can afford to invest trillions on dollars on Sci-Fi technology creating an atmosphere of fear, go to war against countries for oil in the name of liberating another oil rich country, then again go to war to avenge the humiliation of his father who was also a warmonger and president and occupy distant lands at the cost of American blood and taxpayers money, reject critical treaties for the survival of mankind like Kyoto.

If he is a Democrat, gets a fellatio done in the oval office, goes on to become a world peace broker, a great statesman and a respected world leader. His veep then goes on to champion for other causes leaving active politics like tackling global warming, environment degradation etc.
1 Stars
Adrian
Los Angeles, United States
They sit and take decisions made by others. Make speeches written by others. Keep a low profile because it is after all the Men in Black who run the country and not the presidents and the vice presidents. Now you know Rudolf why they don't face the questions from lawmakers like the British PM every Wednesday? But they do make radio speeches every Saturday (of course, written by others).
1 Stars
Alexia
Paris, France
They don't do anything. Nothing at all. There is no comparison between the British Prime Minister and the US President. Apart from facing the parliament every week, the British Prime Minister takes time out to have sex and also sire a baby while in office. When was the last time you heard an American president becoming a father while still the president? Kennedy?
1 Stars
Mary
Eugene, United States
Correct! You are right Rudolf. In George W. Bush's own words last month in DC he said; "I'll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what happened inside this Oval Office."

Now that gets me worried. Any guesses what might have happened inside the Oval Office during his tenure? Can Obama find some skeletons in the closets if and when he becomes the president?
1 Stars
Andre
Lisbon, Portugal
The President of the United States has a lot of things to do. He has to think not only for the rising fuel prices within his country but also the rising cases of deaths by epidemics such a malaria in distant countries like Ghana because in Bush's own words 'it is in the national interest of America'. BTW how would you infer that statement?
1 Stars
Thonoy
Boston, United States
>>> Judging by the 2004 reelection of George W., I wonder if the people have learnt their lesson. But I am sure that the institutions of these United States will see the Republic through to another day irrespective of what happens on November 4, 2008.

One can only hope that the morons who have already chosen to vote for McCain get some good sense between now and Nov 4.
1 Stars
Abby
San Francisco, United States
Yeah the UK Prime Minister is better! Let's do away with our presidential system of democracy and bring in multi-party parliamentary democracy like Britain and India and make the president a ceremonial figurehead. This way a poor man whose decisions might have gone wrong somewhere during his long term is spared of the vilification. Shame on you.
1 Stars
Ali
Ankara, Turkey
There is no doubt that if a president really wants to work and work to get positive results be it in the economic front, foreign affairs, domestic policies he can do it. But it would require a high degree of vision in the person. George Bush made the mistake of trying to get into the history books by making a string of botched attempts starting from the War on Terror and Iraq invasion.
Add your Comment